Inventory
Which AI systems and use cases are active, approved, planned, or embedded in third-party tools?
For covered entities & healthcare organizations
Understand where AI touches sensitive healthcare information.
For provider organizations and healthcare teams adopting AI, an independent assessment can help document systems, data pathways, safeguards, and security risk.
A different engagement trigger
Adoption creates a documentation need.
The goal is not vendor sales evidence. It is a clearer internal view of how AI interacts with sensitive information and what risk decisions need attention.
Trace
What sensitive healthcare information reaches each system, and where does it go?
Evaluate
What governance, access, contractual, monitoring, and incident safeguards exist?
Document
What findings, limitations, ownership, and remediation priorities should be recorded?
Relevant HIPAA safeguards. NIST AI RMF concepts. No certification claim.
The assessment may map relevant findings to applicable HIPAA Security Rule safeguards and align work with NIST AI RMF concepts. It does not certify compliance or prove an AI system is secure.
Next step
Need a clearer record of AI risk inside your organization?
Use a 20-minute scoping call to clarify what the reviewer is asking for, what belongs in scope, and whether an independent Ayliea assessment is a fit.
- Clarify the review request
- Identify systems and evidence
- Define a defensible scope