Direct answers for assessment buyers and reviewers.

The engagement can produce a signed assessment with an executive summary, scoped AI inventory, data-flow documentation, evidence-backed findings, risk prioritization, framework references, limitations, and remediation recommendations. Exact contents depend on the agreed scope.

You may provide the assessment as evidence during relevant security, vendor-risk, procurement, regulatory, or partner diligence. Each reviewer decides what evidence it requires, who may rely on the report, and whether the assessment is sufficient.

A scope may include document review, stakeholder interviews, configuration inspection, observation, demonstrations, and sampling. The written scope states which procedures were performed and which were not.

Not automatically. Penetration testing, source-code review, model-performance evaluation, AI red-teaming, and continuous monitoring are excluded unless separately scoped and documented.

The report identifies unavailable, stale, conflicting, client-represented, and not-tested evidence. Conclusions are qualified when evidence quality or coverage limits confidence.

The report is point-in-time. It states its assessment date or period, evidence cutoff, scope, and change-after-assessment boundary. Material changes may require an update or new assessment.

Do not send regulated records, personal data, credentials, questionnaires, or assessment evidence through the booking page or initial email. Ayliea avoids receiving unnecessary sensitive data, including PHI, and establishes engagement-specific transfer arrangements in writing.

Ayliea is an external, paid assessor rather than the organization being assessed or its regulator. Independence does not imply governmental authority. Potential conflicts are addressed during scoping, and commercial outcomes are not guaranteed.

Factual errors and evidence references can be corrected through a documented review process. A request to change a commercial outcome does not require the assessor to change a supported professional conclusion.

Timing depends on the agreed scope, system count, entities, procedures, evidence readiness, and stakeholder availability. The written scope sets the expected assessment period and delivery plan before work begins.

AI Security Reviews start at $3,500; AI Security Assessments start at $7,500; Comprehensive AI Security Assessments start at $15,000; Enterprise / Complex Scope engagements are custom-scoped. Final pricing is confirmed in a written scope before work begins.

No. Ayliea does not provide a government-backed HIPAA certification, certify that an organization is HIPAA compliant, or guarantee compliance. Relevant findings may be mapped to applicable HIPAA Security Rule safeguards.

Ayliea maps and aligns relevant findings to established AI security frameworks: NIST AI RMF 1.0, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, HIPAA Security Rule, OWASP LLM Top 10, MITRE ATLAS. These references frame the findings so a receiving reviewer can place them in a familiar context. Mapping and alignment are not certification or endorsement—Ayliea is not a certification body—and professional judgments and evidence-quality decisions remain explained and attributable to the assessor.