About Ayliea

A security assessment firm built around accountable judgment.

Ayliea helps organizations explain and improve their AI security posture through independent, evidence-backed assessment work.

Daviyon Daniels, CISSP — Ayliea founder and assessorFounder & assessor

Daviyon Daniels, CISSP

Security judgment should be attributable and supported by evidence.

Daviyon Daniels founded Ayliea and leads its assessment practice. Engagements evaluate the scoped AI environment, available evidence, security controls, findings, and limitations using a documented methodology.

Human review and accountable sign-off remain part of the trust model, but the value of the assessment is the evidence, reasoning, traceability, and usefulness of the resulting report—not the identity of a single individual.

Credentials
  • CISSP
  • M.S. Cybersecurity & Information Assurance — WGU
  • SecurityX (CASP+) | GIAC GSEC | PenTest+ | CySA+

What independent means here

External judgment, with boundaries.

Ayliea is engaged as an external, paid assessor rather than as the organization being assessed, its regulator, or the receiving reviewer. Independence does not imply governmental authority, statutory auditor status, or a guarantee that another organization will accept the report.

Potential conflicts and prior advisory work should be identified during scoping. The assessor may correct factual errors while retaining a supported professional conclusion even when a different commercial outcome is preferred.

Operating principles

What the model is designed to protect.

01

Clarity

State what was assessed, what evidence was used, and where the limits are.

02

Independence

Evaluate in-scope evidence without promising a commercial or compliance outcome.

03

Traceability

Connect material findings to the evidence and reasoning behind them.

04

Accountability

Make material judgments attributable, reviewed, and supported by evidence.

Next step

Need a clearer record of your AI security risk?

Use a 20-minute scoping call to clarify what the reviewer is asking for, what belongs in scope, and whether an independent Ayliea assessment is a fit.

  • Clarify the review request
  • Identify systems and evidence
  • Define a defensible scope